Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
Mais filtros







Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 147(6): 808-812, jun. 2019. graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1020731

RESUMO

Eighty percent of hepatocarcinomas are inoperable at the moment of diagnosis. Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice in these cases, but local therapies are another alternative. Among these, Image-Guided BrachyAblation is a safe choice. We report a 76-year-old male with a hepatocarcinoma, who was considered inoperable due to the high surgical risk of the patient. A local treatment with Image-Guided BrachyAblation was decided. A brachytherapy needle was placed in the tumor under computed tomography guidance and a 15 Gy single dose was delivered from an Iridium-192 source. The patient had no immediate complications and at one month of follow up he continued without incidents.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Braquiterapia/métodos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Técnicas de Ablação/métodos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Doses de Radiação , Radioisótopos de Irídio , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 42(1): 47-52, Jan.-Feb. 2016. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-777332

RESUMO

ABSTRACT We analyzed the long-term oncologic outcome for patients with prostate cancer and transurethral resection who were treated using low-dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy. Methods and Materials: From January 2001 to December 2005, 57 consecutive patients were treated with clinically localized prostate cancer. No patients received external beam radiation. All of them underwent LDR prostate brachytherapy. Biochemical failure was defined according to the "Phoenix consensus". Patients were stratified as low and intermediate risk based on The Memorial Sloan Kettering group definition. Results: The median follow-up time for these 57 patients was 104 months. The overall survival according to Kaplan-Meier estimates was 88% (±6%) at 5 years and 77% (±6%) at 12 years. The 5 and 10 years for failure in tumour-free survival (TFS) was 96% and respectively (±2%), whereas for biochemical control was 94% and respectively (±3%) at 5 and 10 years, 98% (±1%) of patients being free of local recurrence. A patient reported incontinence after treatment (1.7%). The chronic genitourinary complains grade I were 7% and grade II, 10%. At six months 94% of patients reported no change in bowel function.Conclusions: The excellent long-term results and low morbidity presented, as well as the many advantages of prostate brachytherapy over other treatments, demonstrates that brachytherapy is an effective treatment for patients with transurethral resection and clinical organ-confined prostate cancer


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/métodos , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Prognóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Seguimentos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Medição de Risco , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Radioisótopos do Iodo/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
3.
Clinics ; 71(1): 10-16, Jan. 2016. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-771947

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of 252Californium neutron intracavitary brachytherapy using a two-channel Y applicator combined with external beam radiotherapy for the treatment of endometrial cancer. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with stage I-III endometrial cancer were recruited for this study. The stage I patients received only 252Californium neutron intracavitary brachytherapy with a two-channel applicator. The stage II and III patients received both 252Californium neutron intracavitary brachytherapy using a two-channel applicator and parallel-opposed whole pelvic radiotherapy. RESULTS: The five-year local control rate was 80.6% (25/31), the overall survival rate was 51.6% (16/31), and the disease-free survival rate was 54.8% (17/31). The incidence of serious late complications was 12.9% (4/31). CONCLUSIONS: 252Californium neutron intracavitary brachytherapy using a two-channel applicator combined with external beam radiotherapy was effective for treating endometrial cancer and the incidence of serious late complications related to this combination was within an acceptable range.


Assuntos
Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/métodos , Califórnio/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias do Endométrio/radioterapia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Braquiterapia/instrumentação , Terapia Combinada , Carmustina/uso terapêutico , Citarabina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias do Endométrio/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Seguimentos , Melfalan/uso terapêutico , Podofilotoxina/uso terapêutico , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992) ; 61(5): 431-439, Sept.-Oct. 2015. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-766252

RESUMO

Summary Objective: this study analyzes the survival of prostate cancer patients cared for at a hospital in Minas Gerais, Brazil according to one of the following treatments: iodine-125 seed implantation or radical prostatectomy. From January 2002 to December 2005, 129 patients underwent either brachytherapy (64 patients) or surgery (65 patients). Methods: all had prostate-specific antigen, Gleason scores and clinical stage recorded prior to treatment. Biochemical relapse was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA)>0.4ng/mL for radical prostatectomy, and any elevation equal or higher than 2ng/mL over the PSA nadir for implanted patients. To analyze the effect of treatment on biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were generated. Mean follow-up time was 56.1 months for patients with the implant, and 26.6 months for those operated on. BRFS in 5 years was 69% (95% CI: 58.18-77.45) for the whole cohort. Discussion: when stratified according to treatment, survival of patients who had undergone brachytherapy (79.70%) was higher to those operated on (44.30%; pvalue= 0.0056). Upon multivariate analysis, independent predictors were iPSA (HR: 2.91, 95% CI: 1,32-6,42), Gleason score (HR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1,00-4,81) and treatment modality (HR: 2.61, 95% CI: 1.18-5,75). Risk of biochemical failure was higher with surgery than brachytherapy, which may be related to the failure criteria adopted, which is different for each therapy, as well as the high rate of histological progression between preoperative prostate biopsy and surgical specimen. Conclusion: it was found that brachytherapy is a good therapeutic option for low risk prostate cancer.


Resumo Introdução: este estudo avaliou a sobrevida de portadores de câncer localizado de próstata assistidos em um hospital de Minas Gerais, segundo duas modalidades terapêuticas: implante de sementes iodo-125 e prostatectomia radical. A população estudada foi de 129 pacientes tratados no período de janeiro de 2002 a dezembro de 2005 – 64 submetidos à braquiterapia e 65 à cirurgia. Métodos: todos obtiveram registro do antígeno prostático específico, escores de Gleason e estadiamento clínico anterior ao tratamento. A recidiva bioquímica foi definida como PSA > 0,4 ng/mL para prostatectomia radical, e qualquer elevação de 2 ng/mL ou mais a partir do PSA nadir para os pacientes implantados. Para análise do efeito do tratamento na sobrevida livre de recidiva bioquímica (SLRb), foram geradas curvas de Kaplan-Meier e foi efetuada regressão de Cox. O tempo mediano de seguimento foi de 56,1 meses para os implantados e de 26,6 meses para os operados. Discussão: a SLRb em 5 anos para toda coorte foi de 69% (IC95%:58,18-77,45), sendo superior para aqueles submetidos à braquiterapia (79,70%) em relação aos operados (44,30%; p-valor 0,0056). Na análise multivariada, os fatores preditores independentes foram iPSA (HR:2,91; IC95%:1,32-6,42), escore de Gleason (HR:2,18; IC95%:1,00- 4,81) e modalidade de tratamento (HR:2,61; IC95%:1,18- 5,75). O risco de falha bioquímica foi maior com a cirurgia, comparado à braquiterapia, o que pode estar relacionado ao elevado índice de progressão histológica entre biópsia prostática pré-operatória e peça cirúrgica, e pelo critério de falha adotado, distinto para cada terapêutica. Conclusão: foi possível constatar que a braquiterapia é uma boa opção terapêutica para o câncer de próstata de baixo risco.


Assuntos
Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Braquiterapia/métodos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Seguimentos , Radioisótopos do Iodo/uso terapêutico , Gradação de Tumores , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Medição de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida
5.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(3): 435-441, May-June 2015. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-755887

RESUMO

ABSTRACTPurpose

To evaluate dosimetric coverage of the prostate, normal tissue sparing, and acute toxicity with HDR brachytherapy for large prostate volumes.

Materials and Methods

One hundred and two prostate cancer patients with prostate volumes >50 mL (range: 5-29 mL) were treated with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy ± intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to 4,500 cGy in 25 daily fractions between 2009 and 2013. HDR brachytherapy monotherapy doses consisted of two 1,350-1,400 cGy fractions separated by 2-3 weeks, and HDR brachytherapy boost doses consisted of two 950-1,150 cGy fractions separated by 4 weeks. Twelve of 32 (38%) unfavorable intermediate risk, high risk, and very high risk patients received androgen deprivation therapy. Acute toxicity was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.

Results

Median follow-up was 14 months. Dosimetric goals were achieved in over 90% of cases. Three of 102 (3%) patients developed Grade 2 acute proctitis. No variables were significantly associated with Grade 2 acute proctitis. Seventeen of 102 (17%) patients developed Grade 2 acute urinary retention. American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score was the only variable significantly associated with Grade 2 acute urinary retention (p=0.04). There was no ≥ Grade 3 acute toxicity.

Conclusions

Dosimetric coverage of the prostate and normal tissue sparing were adequate in patients with prostate volumes >50 mL. Higher pre-treatment AUA symptom scores increased the relative risk of Grade 2 acute urinary retention. However, the overall incidence of acute toxicity was acceptable in patients with large prostate volumes.

.


Assuntos
Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/métodos , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Modelos Logísticos , Gradação de Tumores , Próstata/efeitos da radiação , Valores de Referência , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Testes de Toxicidade Aguda , Resultado do Tratamento , Carga Tumoral
6.
Arq. neuropsiquiatr ; 73(3): 237-240, 03/2015. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-741198

RESUMO

Topical treatments have gained popularity for general use as an adjunct to systemic drugs in neuropathic pain, but their use produces variable clinical results and local adverse events. Objective To evaluate the safety and analgesic effect of a formulation of liposomal capsaicin (LC) (0.025%) in patients with post herpetic neuralgia (PHN). Method Patients who remained symptomatic after first-and second-line treatment were randomized to receive LC for six weeks in a placebo-controlled, crossover design study. Clinical assessment was performed at baseline, in the second, fourth and sixth week of treatment. Results Thirteen patients completed both treatment periods. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was significantly decreased after the end of the study (p = 0.008), however the effect of treatment was not significant (p = 0.076). There was no difference on global impression of change and other pain characteristics. LC was safe and well tolerated. However, at the concentration used, its analgesic effects were marginal and not significant. .


Os tratamentos tópicos ganharam popularidade para uso geral como um adjuvante de medicamentos sistêmicos na dor neuropática, mas seu uso produz resultados clínicos variáveis e eventos adversos locais. Objetivo Avaliar o efeito de segurança e analgesia de uma formulação de capsaicina lipossomal (LC) (0,025%) em pacientes com neuralgia pós-herpética. Método Os pacientes que permaneceram sintomáticos após tratamento de primeira e de segunda linha foram randomizados para receber LC durante seis semanas em um estudo cruzado controlado por placebo. A avaliação clínica foi realizada no início do estudo, na segunda, quarta e sexta semana de tratamento. Resultados Treze pacientes completaram dois períodos de tratamento. Escala Visual Analógica diminuiu significativamente após o final do estudo (p = 0,008), no entanto, o efeito do tratamento não era significativo (p = 0,076). Não houve diferença na impressão global de mudança e de outras características da dor. LC foi segura e bem tolerada. No entanto, para a concentração utilizada, os seus efeitos analgésicos foram marginais e não significativos. .


Assuntos
Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Braquiterapia/métodos , Radioisótopos do Iodo/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Povo Asiático , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(1): 40-45, jan-feb/2015. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-742862

RESUMO

Purpose There is little information in the literature on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) changes due to high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy monotherapy for prostate cancer. Materials and Methods We conducted a prospective study of HRQOL changes due to HDR brachytherapy monotherapy for low risk or favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer. Sixty-four of 84 (76%) patients who were treated between February 2011 and April 2013 completed 50 questions comprising the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) before treatment and 6 and/or 12 months after treatment. Results Six months after treatment, there was a significant decrease (p<0.05) in EPIC urinary, bowel, and sexual scores, including urinary overall, urinary function, urinary bother, urinary irritative, bowel overall, bowel bother, sexual overall, and sexual bother scores. By one year after treatment, EPIC urinary, bowel, and sexual scores had increased and only the bowel overall and bowel bother scores remained significantly below baseline values. Conclusions HDR brachytherapy monotherapy is well-tolerated in patients with low and favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer. EPIC urinary and sexual domain scores returned to close to baseline 12 months after HDR brachytherapy. .


Assuntos
Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Qualidade de Vida , Biópsia , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Gradação de Tumores , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Transtornos Urinários/fisiopatologia
8.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 40(4): 474-483, Jul-Aug/2014. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-723961

RESUMO

Purpose To assess outcomes with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and a low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy boost without or with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer. Materials and Methods From January 2001 through August 2011, 120 intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer patients were treated with EBRT to a total dose of 4,500 cGy in 25 daily fractions and a palladium-103 LDR brachytherapy boost of 10,000 cGy (n = 90) or an iodine-125 LDR brachytherapy boost of 11,000 cGy (n = 30). ADT, consisting of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist ± an anti-androgen, was administered to 29/92 (32%) intermediate-risk patients for a median duration of 4 months and 26/28 (93%) high-risk patients for a median duration of 28 months. Results Median follow-up was 5.2 years (range, 1.1-12.8 years). There was no statistically-significant difference in biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), or overall survival (OS) without or with ADT. Also, there was no statistically-significant difference in bDFS, DMFS, or OS with a palladium-103 vs. an iodine-125 LDR brachytherapy boost. Conclusions There was no statistically-significant difference in outcomes with the addition of ADT, though the power of the current study was limited. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0815 and 0924 phase III trials, which have accrual targets of more than 1,500 men, will help to clarify the role ADT in locally-advanced prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT and a brachytherapy boost. Palladium-103 and iodine-125 provide similar bDFS, DMFS, and OS. .


Assuntos
Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Seguimentos , Radioisótopos do Iodo/uso terapêutico , Paládio/uso terapêutico , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 40(4): 454-462, Jul-Aug/2014. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-723967

RESUMO

Introduction Brachytherapy is an option for treating low-risk prostate cancer (PC). Biochemical control of low-risk disease can reach 95%. The practice advocated is that a review of prostate biopsies should be mandatory before choosing the best treatment for patients with PC. Our objective was to evaluate the change in PC risk after review of a prostate biopsy by an experienced uropathologist at a reference hospital. Materials and Methods Between December 2003 and August 2012, 182 men were referred to our institution for brachytherapy to treat PC. Their slides were reviewed by the same uropathologist. Results and Discussion Classification risk disagreement occurred in 71 (39%) cases, including one in which no tumor was observed. The main cause of risk change was related to the Gleason score (GS), with 57 (81.4%) cases upgraded to GS 7 or 8. Tumor volume was also compared, although only the number of fragments was reported in most original reports. The concordance of the number of cores affected by tumor was 43.9%, and in 49% of the cases, the number was decreased by the uropathologist. Perineural invasion (PNI) was reported in one quarter of original reports, and the agreement was 58%. Conclusion Slide review by an uropathologist remains essential at reference radiotherapy centers for the treatment of PC. The change in PC risk evaluation is mainly due to the GS, but tumor volume and PNI, which are important for the characterization of tumor aggressiveness, are also misinterpreted and could drive a change in the therapy choice. .


Assuntos
Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Medição de Risco/métodos , Biópsia por Agulha , Braquiterapia/métodos , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Próstata/patologia , Valores de Referência , Fatores de Risco , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Carga Tumoral
10.
Rev. chil. enferm. respir ; 26(3): 141-148, sep. 2010. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-577333

RESUMO

Introduction: The main indication of modern high dose rate end bronchial brachyherapy (HDR EBBT) is the palliation of symptoms related to the growth of the endobronchial lung cancer. Methods: EBBT was performed to 27 patients who suffered symptomatic tumoral endobronchial or tracheal pathology, due to primary bronchial disease or secondary metastasis cancer, evaluating the rate of clinical benefit. The tumors were located at tracheal, carinal or proximal bronchial level. Fibrobronchoscopy was performed to all the patients to measure the degree of airway obstruction and to install brachytherapy endobronchial catheters. Between 1 to 4 fractions of 7 to 7.5 Gy were administered. Dyspnea, cough and hemoptysis were subjectively registered before and after treatment, according to an international validated scale. Results: After treatment, all symptoms considerably decreased, disappearing all of the severe categories. Hemoptysis and dyspnea resolved in a 100 percent and 40 percent of patients, respectively; and cough disappeared or was reduced to a minimum grade in 90 percent of cases.


Introducción: La indicación principal de la braquiterapia endobronquial moderna (BTEB) de alta tasa de dosis (HDR), es la paliación de síntomas por crecimiento endobronquial de cánceres pulmonares. Métodos: Se realizó BTEB HDR a 27 pacientes sintomáticos de patología tumoral endobronquial o traqueal, debido a patologías primarias bronquiales o secundarias metastásicas. Los tumores se ubicaban en tráquea, carina o a nivel bronquialproximal. Para observar mejorías en la sintomatología clínica, a todos se les realizó una fibrobroncoscopía (FBC) para medir el grado de obstrucción bronquial e instalar catéteres endobronquiales de braquiterapia. Se administraron entre 1 y 4 fracciones de 7 a 7,5 Gy. Se registró subjetivamente la disnea, tos y hemoptisis antes y después del tratamiento, de acuerdo a una escala internacionalmente validada. Resultados: Tras el tratamiento todos los síntomas disminuyeron considerablemente, desapareciendo toda sintomatología severa. La hemoptisis y disnea desaparecieron en el 100 por ciento y 40 por ciento de los pacientes respectivamente, y la tos desapareció o disminuyó a grado leve en el 90 por ciento de los pacientes.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Traqueia/radioterapia , Neoplasias Brônquicas/radioterapia , Broncoscopia , Dispneia/radioterapia , Hemoptise/radioterapia , Metástase Neoplásica/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Traqueia/cirurgia , Neoplasias Brônquicas/cirurgia , Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias/radioterapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Traqueia/patologia , Cirurgia Vídeoassistida
11.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 35(5): 573-580, Sept.-Oct. 2009. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-532771

RESUMO

Objectives: To assess the incidence and clinical parameters that could influence migration of seeds in localized prostate cancer patients treated by stranded versus loose sources by Iodine-125 brachytherapy. Material and Methods: 100 patients were treated from January/1998 until December/2006. Age, PSA, clinical stage, Gleason, prostate volume, number of seeds, activity of radioactive seeds, and dosimetric parameters, such as V100, V150 and D90 were evaluated. Results: Mean follow-up was 79 months (18 - 120. CI 95 percent: 72 - 85). Overall, 6 of 100 patients experienced seed migration. Seed migration was found in 4/50 (8 percent) patients using loose seeds and in 2/50 (4 percent) treated by stranded seeds. Mean value dosimetric parameters for stranded seeds were greater than those for loose seeds (V100( percent): 88.7/82, D90(Gy): 149.2/140.3, D90( percent): 104.2/93.8, V150 ( percent): 53.8/47, respectively). No significant difference in migration of seeds was detected between loose and stranded seeds considering age (p = 0.33), PSA (p = 0.391), prostate volume (p = 0.397), activity of radioactive seeds (p = 0.109), number of seeds (p = 0.338), V100 (p = 0.332), although significant differences were measured in the values of D90( percent and Gy) (p = 0.022 and 0.011) and V150 (p = 0.023). Conclusions: Seed migration after brachytherapy might occur and it does affect post-implant dosimetry.


Assuntos
Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Braquiterapia/métodos , Radioisótopos do Iodo/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Braquiterapia/instrumentação , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 34(3): 293-301, May-June 2008. graf, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-489588

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic factors for patients with local or locally advanced prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy (RT) and high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR) according to the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The charts of 209 patients treated between 1997 and 2005 with localized RT and HDR as a boost at the Department of Radiation Oncology, AC Camargo Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil were reviewed. Clinical and treatment parameters i.e.: patient's age, Gleason score, clinical stage, initial PSA (iPSA), risk group (RG) for biochemical failure, doses of RT and HDR were evaluated. Median age and median follow-up time were 68 and 5.3 years, respectively. Median RT and HDR doses were 45 Gy and 20 Gy. RESULTS: Disease specific survival (DSS) at 3.3 year was 94.2 percent. Regarding RG, for the LR (low risk), IR (intermediate risk) and HR (high risk), the DSS rates at 3.3 years were 91.5 percent, 90.2 percent and 88.5 percent, respectively. On univariate analysis prognostic factors related to DSS were RG (p = 0.040), Gleason score ¡Ü 6 ng/mL (p = 0.002), total dose of HDR ¡Ý 20 Gy (p < 0.001) On multivariate analysis the only statistical significant predictive factor for biochemical control (bNED) was the RG, p < 0.001 (CI - 1.147-3.561). CONCLUSIONS: Although the radiation dose administered to the prostate is an important factor related to bNED, this could not be established with statistical significance in this group of patients. To date , in our own experience, HDR associated to RT could be considered a successful approach in the treatment of prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/métodos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/análise , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Seguimentos , Análise Multivariada , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Próstata , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia Conformacional , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Clinics ; 60(4): 299-304, Aug. 2005. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-408029

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Apresentar a experiência do tratamento de 4 pacientes com tumores primários de traquéia, não operados, submetidos à braquiterapia endobrônquica de alta taxa de dose. PACIENTES E MÉTODOS: Dois casos de carcinoma espinocelular, uma recidiva de carcinoma adenóide cístico e uma recidiva de plasmocitoma primário da traquéia. Todos receberam braquiterapia endobrônquica, exclusiva ou como reforço de dose da radioterapia externa. Foram administradas 3 ou 4 frações de 7,5 Gy cada, calculados a 1 cm de profundidade. O seguimento foi considerado a partir do término da braquiterapia. RESULTADOS: Em todos os casos houve resposta completa. Dois pacientes com carcinoma espinocelular evoluíram a óbito em 6 e 33 meses após a braquiterapia, o primeiro, sem evidência de doença e o outro por recidiva local, respectivamente. As outras 2 pacientes encontravam-se vivas após 64 e 110 meses de seguimento, sem evidência de doença. Esses 2 casos apresentaram estenose traqueal em 22 e 69 meses após a braquiterapia, sendo necessária a colocação de prótese traqueal apenas na paciente com carcinoma adenóide cístico. CONCLUSÕES: A braquiterapia endobrônquica de alta taxa de dose pode ser utilizada tanto como reforço de dose da irradiação externa quanto em recidivas. O controle local obtido em 3 de 4 pacientes indica que casos individuais podem se beneficiar desse procedimento. Sobrevida a longo prazo pode ser observada, principalmente nos casos de histologia adenóide cística.


Assuntos
Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Braquiterapia/métodos , Carcinoma Adenoide Cístico/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Plasmocitoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Traqueia/radioterapia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Seguimentos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Arq. bras. cardiol ; 77(3): 270-273, Sept. 2001. ilus
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-298658

RESUMO

Intracoronary brachytherapy using beta or gamma radiation is currently the most efficient type of therapy for preventing the recurrence of coronary in-stent restenosis. Its implementation depends on the interaction among interventionists, radiotherapists, and physicists to assure the safety and quality of the method. The authors report the pioneering experience in Brazil of the treatment of 2 patients with coronary in-stent restenosis, in whom beta radiation was used as part of the international multicenter randomized PREVENT study (Proliferation REduction with Vascular ENergy Trial). The procedures were performed rapidly and did not require significant modifications in the traditional techniques used for conventional angioplasty. Alteration in the radiological protection devices of the hemodynamic laboratory were also not required, showing that intracoronary brachytherapy using beta radiation can be incorporated into the interventional tools of cardiology in our environment


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Braquiterapia/métodos , Doença das Coronárias/radioterapia , Stents , Doença das Coronárias , Recidiva , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA